<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The internet, US and UK politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anthonypainter.co.uk/2010/02/17/the-internet-us-and-uk-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anthonypainter.co.uk/2010/02/17/the-internet-us-and-uk-politics/</link>
	<description>UK, EU and US politics. All stir-fried with a dash of tabasco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: teaparty</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonypainter.co.uk/2010/02/17/the-internet-us-and-uk-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>teaparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonypainter.co.uk/?p=1721#comment-837</guid>
		<description>Hello, superb blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, superb blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The media, the internet and the 2010 British election</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonypainter.co.uk/2010/02/17/the-internet-us-and-uk-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>The media, the internet and the 2010 British election</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonypainter.co.uk/?p=1721#comment-735</guid>
		<description>[...] bottom up, grass-roots campaigning, and as British political analyst Anthony Painter pointed out, Obama&#8217;s campaign was a highly integrated mix of traditional campaigning, internet campaigning and mobile. (Little coverage focused on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bottom up, grass-roots campaigning, and as British political analyst Anthony Painter pointed out, Obama&#8217;s campaign was a highly integrated mix of traditional campaigning, internet campaigning and mobile. (Little coverage focused on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonypainter.co.uk/2010/02/17/the-internet-us-and-uk-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonypainter.co.uk/?p=1721#comment-725</guid>
		<description>Anthony,

Thanks for sharing this presentation. Having covered the 2008 election in the US, I&#039;m often struck at how over-simplified coverage of the Obama campaign. As you point out, it was result of years of party building and Howard Dean&#039;s (at the time) controversial 50 state strategy. The Obama campaign was integrated in a way that the US has never seen: Email, direct mail, virtual phone banking, mobile, social networking, meetups, traditional advertising and organising. 

The thing that seems so odd looking at the UK campaigns and parties is their inability to adapt, not just strategically but politically. However, thinking as I write this comment, that might have to do not with political change in the US than changes in the media. Blogging has had a far greater impact in the US and opened up the debate to a far greater extent than in the UK. 

Again, thanks for sharing the presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony,</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing this presentation. Having covered the 2008 election in the US, I&#8217;m often struck at how over-simplified coverage of the Obama campaign. As you point out, it was result of years of party building and Howard Dean&#8217;s (at the time) controversial 50 state strategy. The Obama campaign was integrated in a way that the US has never seen: Email, direct mail, virtual phone banking, mobile, social networking, meetups, traditional advertising and organising. </p>
<p>The thing that seems so odd looking at the UK campaigns and parties is their inability to adapt, not just strategically but politically. However, thinking as I write this comment, that might have to do not with political change in the US than changes in the media. Blogging has had a far greater impact in the US and opened up the debate to a far greater extent than in the UK. </p>
<p>Again, thanks for sharing the presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonypainter.co.uk/2010/02/17/the-internet-us-and-uk-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonypainter.co.uk/?p=1721#comment-723</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by anthonypainter: BLOG POST: My presentation at the LSE last night on the internet, US and UK politics. Tough conclusions for the UK...http://bit.ly/b6Vac5...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by anthonypainter: BLOG POST: My presentation at the LSE last night on the internet, US and UK politics. Tough conclusions for the UK&#8230;http://bit.ly/b6Vac5&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

